Equipment List
Mobile Crusher Plant
Mobile stone crusher plant is a portable crushing machine designed to process and crush stones, rocks, and other hard materials at a specific site. Unlike traditional stationary crushers, mobile crusher plants are mounted on wheels or tracks, allowing them to be easily transported to different locations. This makes them ideal for construction sites, mining operations, and road projects where materials need to be crushed on-site.
Mobile stone crusher plants are widely used in industries requiring efficient and flexible crushing solutions. They are particularly beneficial for projects with limited space or those requiring frequent relocation.

Mobile Crusher Plant

Crawler Crusher Plant
We will customize a suitable mining or concrete solution for you.
Our technical advantages

High - efficiency and energy - saving technology

Precision control technology

Wear - resistant materials and processes

Convenient maintenance design
Fill out the enquiry form and we will contact you shortly.
What Is The Difference Between tyre stone crusher And crawler stone crusher?
Here’s a detailed comparison between tyre-mounted (wheeled) stone crushers and crawler-mounted (tracked) stone crushers, covering their differences in mobility, performance, cost, and applications:
1. Mobility & Transportation
Feature | Tyre-Mounted Crusher | Crawler-Mounted Crusher |
---|---|---|
Movement | Towed by truck/tractor (semi-mobile) | Self-propelled via hydraulic tracks (fully mobile) |
Speed | Faster relocation (up to 80 km/h on roads) | Slow (0.5–2 km/h), but no need for trailers |
Terrain | Requires flat, stable ground (e.g., highways) | Handles rough terrain (mud, slopes, rubble) |
Setup Time | 30–60 mins (needs disassembly for transport) | <15 mins (ready to crush immediately) |
2. Performance & Capabilities
Aspect | Tyre Crusher | Crawler Crusher |
---|---|---|
Stability | Less stable on uneven ground | Excellent stability (low center of gravity) |
Crushing Capacity | Usually lower (due to lighter chassis) | Higher (heavy-duty tracks support larger crushers) |
Fuel Efficiency | Better (when stationary) | Lower (tracks consume more energy) |
Noise/Vibration | Higher (tyres transmit more vibration) | Lower (tracks absorb shocks) |
3. Cost Comparison
Factor | Tyre-Mounted | Crawler-Mounted |
---|---|---|
Initial Cost | 20–30% cheaper | More expensive (complex track system) |
Maintenance | Lower (tyres are cheaper to replace) | Higher (track pads, rollers, hydraulics) |
Lifespan | 5–8 years (tyres wear faster) | 8–12 years (robust tracks) |
4. Ideal Applications
-
Choose Tyre-Mounted If:
-
You need frequent relocation between smooth sites.
-
Budget is limited, and fuel efficiency is a priority.
-
Processing medium-hard materials (e.g., limestone).
-
-
Choose Crawler-Mounted If:
-
Working on uneven or remote terrain (e.g., mining, demolition).
-
Require higher throughput (e.g., granite, basalt).
-
Need quick setup/teardown (e.g., rental operations).
-
Summary Table
Decision Factor | Tyre Crusher ✅ | Crawler Crusher ✅ |
---|---|---|
Budget | Lower upfront cost | Higher investment |
Mobility | Fast road transport | Off-road capability |
Durability | Moderate | Extreme conditions |
Output | 50–300 TPH | 100–500 TPH |
Tip: For urban construction waste recycling, a tyre crusher may suffice. For a granite quarry with rugged terrain, crawler crushers dominate.
Would you like recommendations based on your specific material or project location?